Ronald Oussoren wrote: > > On 14 Jun, 2007, at 22:42, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > >> >> On Jun 14, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Nicholas Riley wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:16:08PM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote: >>>> However, if was nice to have some stuff without any external >>>> dependencies -- is there a lightweight way to do just Easy Dialogs, >>>> without all of PyObjC? >>> >>> It shouldn't be hard to simply wrap a Cocoa EasyDialogs implementation >>> in C to construct a traditional Python module, but it make ssense to >>> wait and see how much of Carbon is no longer going to be supported in >>> 64-bit on Leopard (probably the WWDC attendees find out today but it's >>> NDA'd). Cocoa doesn't have a generic API that matches that of >>> EasyDialogs as much as Carbon does. >> >> The WWDC attendees (me included) already know but as you say that info >> is under NDA ;-). > > But luckily the situation is explained on a mailinglist: > > http://lists.apple.com/archives/Carbon-dev/2007/Jun/msg00260.html > > The summary: no 64-bit Carbon GUI libraries. I haven't even tried to > compile Python's Carbon wrapper in 64-bit mode, I'd be surprised if they > compiled cleanly because Apple has done some serious spring-cleaning in > 64-bit mode. > > Ronald >
A couple of questions: 1. Will applications that are 32 bit have any problems running under Leopard? 2. Would Python have to be specifically compiled as 64-bit to support PyObjC, or would 32-bit Python be OK? --Kevin -- Kevin Walzer Code by Kevin http://www.codebykevin.com _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
