It would be interesting to see if that held up on ppc64. My guess is that it would benchmark slower in 64-bit mode than 32-bit mode on ppc.
- Ian On Jan 20, 2008, at 2:27 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > > On 19 Jan, 2008, at 21:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >> My Powerbook G4 is getting rather long-in-the-tooth. It's display is >> starting to act up, so I think I'm going to buy a new Mac something >> in the >> fairly near future, but I'm not yet sure what. To that end, I've >> started a >> table of pystone numbers for Macs on the Python wiki: >> >> http://wiki.python.org/moin/MacPython/MacModelPerformance >> >> If you could help by adding some rows to the table, especially for >> current >> MacBook, MacBook Pro or (in the near future, MacBook Air) models, I'd >> appreciate it. > > I've posted some numbers as well, which in itself doesn't warrent an > e-mail. What is interesting though is the difference between 32-bit > and 64-bit code: > > Python 2.5.2a0 (60124) > > 32-bit: 52083 > 64-bit: 60871 > > 64-bit code is significantly faster here (all of this on a MacBook > Pro 2.33Ghz/3GByte) > > Ronald >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Skip Montanaro - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.webfast.com/~skip/ >> >> The major difference between Democrats and Republicans is that >> Republicans don't know that Randy Newman's lyrics are full of >> sarcasm. >> _______________________________________________ >> Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig > > _______________________________________________ > Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
