I'm not sure I understand what you mean. I can certainly add any packages I like to my Framework build so I don't think availability of packages is a concern.
Unless I'm misinterpreting the term "packages"? On Tue, June 30, 2009 8:11 am, Alexandre Quessy wrote: > Hi ! > Seems to me there are a lot of python packages that are available > through the MacPorts. In the built-in framework, there are only a few > basic packages. Fink gives the same benefits than MacPorts, but there > might be fewer packages available though it than through MacPorts. > That's why I use MacPorts. > Is this right ? > > a > > 2009/6/30 Dan Ross <d...@rosspixelworks.com>: >> I currently use a Framework of 2.6.2 for my Python work but I always see >> a >> lot of posts about using Fink or MacPorts builds. >> >> Could anyone shed some light on why they use these rather than a >> Framework? >> >> Advantages/disadvantages? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Dan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pythonmac-SIG maillist - pythonmac-...@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig >> > > > > -- > Alexandre Quessy > http://alexandre.quessy.net/ > _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig