On Wed, Oct 07, 2009, Ned Deily wrote: > > So, to summarize, I suggest that we continue to provide the current > style of 10.3+ 32-fat installers for 2.m.n and 3.x.y for the indefinite > future and that we work towards providing a second installer for 2.m.n > and 3.x.y (m, n, x, y TBD), providing 10.6+ intel 32/64 support. If > that seems reasonable to everyone (and, particularly, to Ronald), > perhaps we should open a tracker issue (more a meta-issue) towards that > end.
Sounds reasonably good to me! I am less interested in 64-bit support than cross-platform support, but I still want to keep up with changes in Python etc. -- Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "....Normal is what cuts off your sixth finger and your tail..." --Siobhan _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
