After spending some time getting bundlebuilder to work with my 64-bit programs, I have begun to wonder: what's the rationale for removing it from Python 3.X?

Its Carbon dependencies can be eliminated by simply removing the "import argvemulator" statement, so (as far as I can see) there is no serious technical impediment to leaving it in the Python library. Bundlbuilder doesn't really argvemulation anyway, since hooks for this exist in all the major GUI libraries (Tk, wxPython, and certainly PyObjC).

And while bundlebuilder is a less robust tool than py2app, it is nonetheless capable enough: I'm shipping two commercial applications that make use of it. In fact, its simplicity (a single module) make it easier to dig into and patch, something I can't do with py2app. I wouldn't have been able to release my applications without it.

What's the best way to keep bundlebuilder available for Python 3.x? Submit a feature request at the bug tracker? Or separate it out, and submit a PyPi project?

--Kevin
--
Kevin Walzer
Code by Kevin
http://www.codebykevin.com
_______________________________________________
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig

Reply via email to