Rodney Somerstein wrote: > At 11:17 AM -0700 5/25/10, Christopher Barker wrote: >> Honestly, I don't know if the Mac is in any poorer position with >> regard to Python 3 as any other platform. >> >> NONE of the major packages I use have been ported to Py3 on any >> platform: numpy, SciPy, wxPython. Many of those are well supported on >> the Mac, so I don't think there will be any issues there. > > Thanks, Chris. This is the kind of thing I was trying to find out. After > I asked the question I started reading the comp.lang.python newsgroup > and see that lots of people seem to be in the same situation. There are > a fair number of people wanting to USE Python 3.x - that is, develop > WITH Python 3.x. However, the people that make all of the tools for > those of us that want to use them are not porting or are at least not > being very public about their ports.
Another problem with porting packages to Python 3 is that Boost.Python or Pyrex are not yet available for Python 3 (Boost.Python is supposed to support Python 3 now, but it didn't work for me). These are used to write extension modules and as long as they are not ready, this will block all the packages that are based on those tools. > development community is a bit problematic. Unless the powers that be > decide to once and for all cease development of the 2.x branch of > Python, I'm not sure that 3.x will ever end up having the support that > it needs in terms of ported packages. If I had the ability to port > something like wxPython, I would definitely do so. By the way, for doing cross-platform GUI development you could also have a look at PyQt. I think there's no binary around, but building for Python 3 went absolutely smooth in my case. > Unfortunately, that > isn't the case. It seems kind of strange to start doing work with 2.7 > when supposedly 3.1.2 is the current version. I'm quite sure that Python 2.7 will still be around for quite a while. There's a growing number of commercial applications that use Python as their scripting language and I would imagine that in their case, it takes even longer until they move to Python 3, so the demand for Python 2.x packages will still be there for a while. Apart from that, they are not entirely different languages, so if you want to give Python a try, you could just as well begin with Python 2.6 or 2.7. If you write your programs with Python 3 in mind, then I think moving to Python 3 eventually won't be such a big issue. You can use the "-3" option when running Python to get warnings when you use stuff that's incompatible with Python 3. Then there's the 2to3 tool that can convert a lot of stuff automatically. If you are using an IDE that has dedicated support for Python, you might also be able to tell it you are writing code for Python 3, so that it warns you when you are writing incompatible code. For example, in Eclipse/PyDev you can set the grammar version that should be used for checking the Python syntax (it constantly yells at me because I'm still not used to print being a function... ;) ) Cheers, - Matthias - _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/Pythonmac-SIG
