On 1 Jun, 2010, at 11:36, Johan Gyllenspetz wrote: > On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Ronald Oussoren <ronaldousso...@mac.com> > wrote: >> >> On 31 May, 2010, at 23:25, Johan Gyllenspetz wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> What is the status on py2app -> snow leopard -> x86_64 and ports. >> >> What ports? >> > > Sorry I ment macports. > >>> Do I >>> really need to build all port packages with the flag +universal, it >>> seems like it seems the application when inspected returns. >>> >>> file dist/dog.app/Contents/MacOS/dog >>> dist/dog.app/Contents/MacOS/dog: Mach-O universal binary with 2 >>> architectures >>> dist/dog.app/Contents/MacOS/dog (for architecture i386): Mach-O >>> executable i386 >>> dist/dog.app/Contents/MacOS/dog (for architecture ppc): Mach-O >>> executable ppc >>> >>> Is there a way to tell py2app to build the app for x86_64 instead thus >>> solving the issue with having to build all port packages with the >>> universal flag (which can be quite tricky). >> >> Rebuilding the stub executable in the py2app package should be enough to >> enable building 64-bit binaries. Adding proper support for this is on my >> list, but I don't know when I'll get around to it. >> > > Nice! Any tips of how I rebuild the binary manually?
There is a setup.py in py2app/apptemplate (and also in .../bundletemplate if you want to build a plugin bundle). First remove 'prebuilt/main'. Ronald
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/Pythonmac-SIG
