On 8 Jun, 2011, at 15:15, Christopher Barker wrote:

> Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>>>> That should be "is really *NOT* expected to work right...". :)
> 
>> And that's wrong. Py2app should work just fine with Apple's python,
>> and then creates a semi-standalone app bundle that doesn't include
>> Python itself. The advantage is a smaller application bundle, the
>> disadvantage is that you must run it on the same OSX release as you
>> built it on (or a newer one, AFAIK the result of building on 10.5 can
>> run on 10.6)
> 
> OK -- I've always know that that was supposed to be the case, and a py2app'd 
> bundle should certainly work on the machine it was built on anyway.
> 
> However, if I recall correctly, there have been issues for years with not 
> just the core Python distribution not being included, but things getting ugly 
> with installed add on packages not getting included either (or not properly). 
> So I've always stayed away from trying, and encouraged others to do the same. 
> That experience may be the result of bugs that no longer exist.
> 
> 
> OTOH, if, indeed, using the system python results in a smaller bundle that 
> works just fine on all versions of OS-X >= to the one it was built on -- that 
> could be really nice and useful.

That's the intention, but there may still be bugs as py2app still has fairly 
minimal test coverage and I don't use the system python for my day-to-day work. 
I'm adding new tests with every bugfix, but that's not good enough to get 
proper test coverage in a reasonable timeframe.

Ronald

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/Pythonmac-SIG

Reply via email to