On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:56 PM, Matthias Baas <matthias.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > a while back there has been a discussion about Python 3 support in > bdist_mpkg. Basically, I was in the same situation as the original > poster and was looking for a way to produce binary packages for Python 3. > As it seemed that bdist_mpkg is not maintained anymore and it's using an > obsolete package format anyway, I started getting my hands dirty and > looked into writing a replacement for it. In the end, it wasn't actually > that difficult and it works fine for my project now. > > So far, I didn't publish it anywhere but if there's enough demand, I'd > be happy to create a project space somewhere and make it available. > It's implemented as a regular distutils command (called bdist_osxinst, > similar to the existing bdist_wininst), so usage should be as you > probably would expect. It works with Python 2 and 3 and I tried to make > it fairly generic and not tailor it to my own project. > I for one would be very interested in seeing what you've done. So, yes, +1 vote for that from me. Thanks, Bill _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/Pythonmac-SIG
