On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Ronald Oussoren <ronaldousso...@mac.com> wrote:
> From what I've seen so far, and that's only a 5 minute glance at the public > documentation, Swift will be a competing product as an easy scripting-like > way to build applications. That's no reason to stop work on PyObjC though, > I'm using PyObjC to write GUIs for applications where most of the code is > written in Python and is using cross-platform Python code. Swift changes > nothing for that use case w.r.t. Objective-C. I'm very glad to hear you say this. I have downloaded the documentation for Swift, and read it. It looks like a huge improvement on Objective-C, but I would have been very sad indeed if it had led you to abandon PyObjC. In fact, if you are right that there is now some kind of translation table that could make PyObjC method names even better, that would be really brilliant. N. _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/Pythonmac-SIG
