Hi Thomas,
I'm now trying the SCons build. I had a look at the website today - Scons is
pretty cool, I see why you want to use it now.
I have edited SConstruct to set OOC_LIB, OCC_INC and CONFIG_H_PATH, as I have
been doing in setup.py. I see the following warning:
scons: warning: Two different environments were specified for target
SWIG_src_modular_linux_darwin/GProp_wrap.cc,
but they appear to have the same action: $SWIG -o $TARGET
${_SWIGOUTDIR}
${_SWIGINCFLAGS} $SWIGFLAGS $SOURCES
File "/home/magill/occ/pythonOCC_149/src/SConstruct", line 331, in <module>
I'm not sure what this is about? It doesn't seem to stop the build though.
Boy, it takes a while to build those SWIG files! All done though, no errors,
everything seems to build fine.
Arthur
Thomas Paviot wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I just added a few other samples releated to 'topology building'. I use
> now another way to develop samples: I base my work on the OpenCascade
> MFC samples, get the C++ source code generated in a text window,
> copy/paste and port it to pythonocc. Beware to the Sandor Racz's
> pythonCascade samples: they were developed with an old release of OCC
> (5.x), and the 6.3.0 API changed a bit since this release.
>
> On the screenshot below (edge.py sample), you can notice that every
> shape is displayed in different colors: I added a "DisplayColoredShape"
> in the OCCViewer.py module: I was fed up with the default yellow color.
> Very simple to use:
> display.DisplayColoredShape(your_shape, 'RED') (I built a dict with
> string keys that avoid to import the Quantity module and use
> Quantity_NOC_RED_NOC.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Thomas
>
>
_______________________________________________
Pythonocc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
