Maybe I've misunderstood - I thought you were discussing dual licensing PythonOCC? In which case the license of OpenCASCADE itself becomes important, which is a bit ambiguous, no?
Arthur Jelle Feringa wrote: >> I have no problem with dual licensing, and would be quite happy if >> you and Thomas can make a little back for the immense amount of work >> you've put in. >> But just a quick question - how does this fit in with the (somewhat >> ambiguous) OCC license? I can't remember if it is GPL- or LGPL-like >> - but I think that makes a difference to your plans? > > PythonOCC is GPL, *no* ambiguity there ;') > True, LGPL is far (L)esser restrictive and doesn't work for a dual > licensing. > > -jelle -- Arthur Magill, PhD RF Engineer Centre d'Imagerie BioMédicale (CIBM) Laboratory for Functional and Metabolic Imaging (LIFMET) Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Station 6, CH F1 532 (Bâtiment CH), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland tel: +41 21 693 0569 fax: +41 21 693 7960 email: arthur.mag...@epfl.ch _______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
