On Apr 30, 2009, at 2:23 PM, thomas.pav...@free.fr wrote: >> Hi Thomas, > > Hi Jelle, > >> The gp module is interesting, since there is a OCC.gp.gp module. >> Right now we can call: from OCC.gp import gp; gp.DX() > > You have to instanciate the gp class before calling the DX method: > gp().DX()
True, but the point is that in the renaming the instancing would have to be done at the SWIG level. Since otherwise you will call an unbound object at gp.DX() ( in the proposed renaming ). As far as I know this is the only ( important ) module that does this... ugly, but its like that... >> This will become from OCC import gp; gp.DX() ? > > It would be better, no? The 'gp' class has the same name as the 'gp' > module and it's very confusing. This renaming requires a few more > work since the instanciation of the gp() class has to be hidden to > the user. Yep, I think so too... completely hidden _______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
