Arthur Magill a écrit : > Linux is a bit of a different beast to Windows and OSX - you can do almost > anything with it, and somebody out there will have done something you never > imagined. > > I think our problems with Linux are largely with OCC itself, rather than > pythonOCC. OCC is a big package - I looked into making an RPM available for > Fedora, but I don't think my packaging skills are up to it (I'd rather spend > the > time elsewhere). > > Building pythonOCC using the setup.py script works well. I think we should > work > out a dependency list though - that would help get starters to install the > right > packages first. > > I'm happy to maintain the wiki page, but I'll need some support for different > distros. I can test Fedora here, and generally guess what to do for Debian, > Ubuntu, SuSE, Gentoo, etc, but it would be really useful to have someone who > could actually test install instructions. A list of people I can ask for > particular distributions would be helpful (volunteers welcome!). >
Hi Arthur, I'm volunteer for reports about Ubuntu 8.04 > Arthur > Thomas > > Jelle Feringa wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> It seems pretty unreasonable that its still hard to get pythonOCC >> going on linux. >> win32 is doing just fine ( ( even) more power to you Thomas ) and osx >> are doing relatively ok ( osx has some troubles with the wxGTK >> dependency, but pythonOCC works as advertised ) >> >> I wonder what options are there to improve linux support. >> Binaries perhaps isn't the best of ideas, since linux is such a >> diverse platform. >> Therefore installation documentation should be pursued with the same >> rigor as a binary distribution. >> False, outdated, failing documentation is such a cliche that I >> *really* would hate to see pythonOCC suffer those consequences. >> >> I can imagine that splitting up the linux installation wiki to the >> different distributions, perhaps even assigning a maintainer ( someone >> who validates the wiki info before its set out in the wild ) for those >> sections would largely improve the situation. >> >> Any better ideas? >> >> Cheers, >> >> -jelle >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pythonocc-users mailing list >> Pythonocc-users@gna.org >> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pythonocc-users mailing list > Pythonocc-users@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users > > _______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
