Hi Dave, (a) The /Slicer folder and all files are there, (b) everything works fine (Python2.5, latest svn rev.).
If you want to redistribute this program in a all-in-one file, you will certainly have to use py2exe (if you're running Windows). I have a long experience with it, but never tested a pythonOCC based script. Cheers, Thomas 2009/6/12 Cowdens <dave.cow...@gmail.com> > Hey everyone: > > Finally got around to getting my svn key set up, and... i think i've > successfully committed Slicer to the tools directory in SVN. > > Can you guys check and make sure that (a) it is there, and (b) it works > with the trunk version? I ran it locally before commiting, but i would like > to make sure it works with the latest SVN version-- if It does not I will > fix it. > > To test, please run ( from Tools\Slicer directory ): > > >python OccSliceLib.py parts\Test.STEP > > You should see a nice weird shape, a bunch of slices, and then a > Test_Sliced.svg file produced.. > > I'm really looking forward to seeing this in a single- downloadable > release-- i cannot wait to report this to the Reprappers, that one download > gets them running! > > Thanks for all your help guys! > Dave > > ------------------------------ > *From:* pythonocc-users-boun...@gna.org [mailto: > pythonocc-users-boun...@gna.org] *On Behalf Of *Thomas Paviot > *Sent:* Friday, June 05, 2009 10:09 AM > *To:* pythonOCC users mailing list. > *Subject:* Re: [Pythonocc-users] Assembly representation > > 2009/6/5 Bryan Bishop <kanz...@gmail.com> > >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Thomas Paviot <tpav...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > 2009/6/5 Bryan Bishop <kanz...@gmail.com> >> >> I was wondering whether or not there is a way to express mating >> >> constraints in OpenCASCADE and pythonOCC. >> > >> > OpenCASCADE does not come with any mating constraints system. >> >> What about assemblies in general? The SLDPART file format, for instance. > > > You mean SLDASM? The SolidWorks file format is proprietary (as well as > Catia CATPRoduct one, Autodesk inventor etc.) and binary. It's then > impossible to get any infromation from it. But one can consider there are 2 > main issues: > - the way the mates are described (not so difficult), > - the mate solver (much more difficult). For instance, just being able to > ensure that 'there's a solution' would already be a novelty. > > >> >> - Bryan >> > > Thomas > > > _______________________________________________ > Pythonocc-users mailing list > Pythonocc-users@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users > >
_______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
