2009/8/17 Sébastien Ramage <sebastien.ram...@gmail.com> > Hi all,
Hi Sébastien, > > > I have a small suggestion, maybe it would be usefull to have windows > binary for salomegeometry and OCC for both python 2.5/2.6 (vc7.1 and > vc9) in svn ? > something like > > trunk\bin\SalomeGeometry\py2.5\win32\bin > trunk\bin\SalomeGeometry\py2.5\win32\lib > trunk\bin\OCC\py2.5\win32\bin > trunk\bin\OCC\py2.5\win32\lib > > trunk\bin\SalomeGeometry\py2.6\win32\bin > trunk\bin\SalomeGeometry\py2.6\win32\lib > trunk\bin\OCC\py2.6\win32\bin > trunk\bin\OCC\py2.6\win32\lib Jelle and I had this discussion a few days ago. According to us, the svn trunk should not polluted with many and heavy binary files. Everyone should be able to get a local copy of the svn trunk in a few seconds and a small required free size on hard disk. I included the SalomeGEOM binaries in the trunk but I wonder now whether it's a good idea. I think that it's better to have only source code in the subversion repository, and provide binaries as zip/tar.gz archives from the website or another location. > > > And add a tweak in setup.py to copy dll directly if we want ALL_IN_ONE > or not > > Sébastien Thomas
_______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
