On 2010/5/18 Jelle Feringa wrote: > I urge you not to use these classes, but rather their pythonic nephews found > in OCC.Utils.Topology.Topo. > These classes are really neat and clean.
Just curious, what is wrong with TopExp_Explorer? I do not understand the benefit of OCC.Utils.Topology.Topo, you defined many methods (vertices_from_edge, edges_from_vertex, edges_from_face, faces_from_edge, etc) and to be exhaustive, many more would have to be added (to deal with shells, solids, comp_solids and compounds). Wouldn't it be simpler to expose _loop_topo and _map_shapes_and_ancestors instead of all these functions? BTW I believe that l.305 of Topology.py should return 0 instead of None. Denis _______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
