2010/8/16 Free Cad <free...@ymail.com> > >Von: Thomas Paviot <tpav...@gmail.com> > >An: pythonOCC users mailing list. <pythonocc-users@gna.org> > >Gesendet: Samstag, den 14. August 2010, 15:59:25 Uhr > >Betreff: Re: [Pythonocc-users] face from self-intersecting wire, ShapeFix > > > > > > > > > >Dear Bjorn, > > > > > >I tested your sample but did not experiment that much the ShapeFix OCC > module. I > > > >do not have any answer to your question yet, but I will investigate this > issue > >further. In the meantime, you can post to the OCC forum > >(http://www.opencascade.org/org/forum/) where you will meet the whole > >OpenCascade community. > > Dear Thomas, > is my assumption correct that investigating this issue will take months or > years without an upper limit? Similar to other questions that somebody > wanted to > look into? >
Dear Björn, Don't know whether or not your assumption is valid, but you're a bit pessimistic ;-) I think I will do without pythonocc, because the complicated opencascade API > with the python bugs added on top make it impossible to get anything done. > I do not agree with your proposition. OpenCascade is indeed a huge and complex API, and topology fixing is not an easy science. "impossible to get anything done" is not true: it's actually possible to get many things done! (just look at the examples). "I didn't manage to get what I need" would certainly be a more appropriate statement. Furthermore, what are the "python bugs added on top" you're talking about? Is it the issues already reported here http://code.google.com/p/pythonocc/issues/list ? I'm not sure they are the cause of your unsuccessful attempts. Did you identify other issues that have not been reported yet and I would not be aware of? I'm much looking forward to having your feedbacks about it. > Happy pythoning! > Björn > > Kind Regards, Thomas
_______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
