Hi Thomas,

i will give it a try. Exchange formats always cause pain, especially
when they are continuously evolving. I will let you know, what results i
had with AP203 using the svn-snapshot.

Thanks a lot!
Regards

JC

Thomas Paviot schrieb:
> Hello Marco,
>
> Of course I agree with you. I should have said : "Under
> the assumption that the vendors implement the standard and strictly
> comply with it, [blabla]". I confess it's a strong assumption! But
> necessary for anyone believing in the STEP standard and its potential
> to save time and money. There's still a huge amount of work to be
> achieved, but let's keep optimistic.
>
> All the best,
>
> Thomas
>
> 2010/10/11 M. Nawijn <naw...@gmail.com <mailto:naw...@gmail.com>>
>
>     Hello Thomas,
>
>     I must agree with you that in general STEP would be the preferred
>     option
>     to exchange geometry. I have had this kind of discussion many
>     times. There
>     are however some subtleties. One is that it the enriched semantics
>     of STEP is
>     of no use when the target application does not support it. This is
>     still the case with
>     many industry standard FEA programs for example.
>
>     In the end it really depends on the quality of the exporters and
>     importers. We have
>     had examples of very complex CAD (single part) models that provided a
>     better quality
>     for meshing purposes when imported through IGES than through STEP.
>
>     Kind regards,
>
>     Marco
>
>
>     On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Thomas Paviot <tpav...@gmail.com
>     <mailto:tpav...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>     > Jens,
>     > By default, pythonOCC exports STEP files using the AP214 schema.
>     After you
>     > export the step file with Abaqus, the schema used is not the
>     AP214 anymore
>     > but the AP203 : when dealing with standard files import/export
>     issues, the
>     > problems may arise from the exporter and/or the importer, and
>     it's not
>     > obvious to find out the responsible of the issue. Using the same
>     STEP schema
>     > for import/export ensures the semantics consistency of the
>     exchange process.
>     > Is there any option, in Abaqus, to use the AP214 instead of the
>     AP203?
>     > If you use the latest pythonOCC release (0.4), you can't change
>     the default
>     > behavior (AP214) of the STEP exporter. However, the latest
>     revision of the
>     > svn trunk makes it possible (see this
>     >
>     discussion: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/pythonocc-users@gna.org/msg01462.html).
>     > At last, I'm not sure whether or not the exchanges based upon
>     the IGES
>     > standard are still a good way to proceed. I would say 'no',
>     since the STEP
>     > scope is much wider than the IGES one (which is only intended to
>     geometry)
>     > and, as a consequence, more suitable for industrial processes.
>     >
>     > Regards,
>     > Thomas
>     >
>     > 2010/10/11 Jens Cornelis <jens.corne...@iwm.fraunhofer.de
>     <mailto:jens.corne...@iwm.fraunhofer.de>>
>     >>
>     >> Hi Jelle, hi Thomas,
>     >>
>     >> btw: exporting the same shape to a IGES file and imorting in Abaqus
>     >> works fine. Abaqus imports it as a solid, just as expected. The
>     issue is
>     >> only when exporting to STEP (the preferred file format.)
>     >>
>     >> Maybe this information is somehow interesting for you?
>     >>
>     >> Cheers
>     >>
>     >> JC
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> Pythonocc-users mailing list
>     >> Pythonocc-users@gna.org <mailto:Pythonocc-users@gna.org>
>     >> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Pythonocc-users mailing list
>     > Pythonocc-users@gna.org <mailto:Pythonocc-users@gna.org>
>     > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
>     >
>     >
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Pythonocc-users mailing list
>     Pythonocc-users@gna.org <mailto:Pythonocc-users@gna.org>
>     https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pythonocc-users mailing list
> Pythonocc-users@gna.org
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
>   


-- 

Jens Cornelis
Fraunhofer-Institut fuer Werkstoffmechanik IWM
Woehlerstr. 11
79108 Freiburg
Telefon +49 761 5142-280
Fax +49 761 5142-110
jens.corne...@iwm.fraunhofer.de
www.iwm.fraunhofer.de


_______________________________________________
Pythonocc-users mailing list
Pythonocc-users@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users

Reply via email to