Hi Thomas, The initiative is not from myself so I shouldn't speak for it. Nonetheless, with respect to the previous situation, one now highlights 2 advantages in it: -1st, the user and devlopper mutual feedbacks through the bug tracking system -2nd, yes this makes a 2nd repository, but this has already been seen in other projects. For instance, the "Open64.net" and the "AMD x86 Open64 Compiler Suite" (same project)
Bests, Pierre 2011/1/30 Thomas Paviot <tpav...@gmail.com> > 2011/1/29 Pierre JUILLARD <pierre.juill...@gmail.com> > > Hi Thomas, hi Jelle, >> >> I don't know if you heard about the initiative of Christophe on the "Open >> Salome Community Edition" that was talked on the Salome forum here: >> http://www.salome-platform.org/forum/forum_14/525157487/view >> http://opensalome.org/ >> >> I was thinking that maybe it could interest you as you handle the GEOM and >> SMESH modules in pythonOCC. >> If it happend that you come to see bugs, of think to additionnal features >> to these modules, it maybe a good solution to report them there so that >> maybe in a future, it is reported to upstream version. >> >> (just spreading a bit wider the word) >> >> Bests, >> >> Pierre >> >> > Hi Pierre, > > Thanks for the links. So, from now, there are two repositories, right? An > 'official' GIT repository, and a 'Community' svn repos as far as I > understand, intended to users contribution. A bit messy, no? > > Thomas > > > _______________________________________________ > Pythonocc-users mailing list > Pythonocc-users@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users > >
_______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
