Build problem circumvented (was 2.7 related). We now have packages for lucid and maverick (2.6) as well as for natty oneiric (2.7). Am 29.07.2011 00:50 schrieb "Thomas Paviot" <tpav...@gmail.com>: > 2011/7/29 Henning Meyer <tutm...@gmail.com> > >> Thank you. But I must confess that I am by no means a proficient >> package builder. Actually I'm new to python since 3 months ;-) >> > > Only 1 week is enough to get familiar with python. 3 months is an eternity > ;-) > > >> Currently I'm having trouble getting a working maverick package. If >> someone would be willing to have a look, it would be very appreciated: >> https://launchpad.net/~hmeyer/+archive/pythoncad/+build/2653352< https://launchpad.net/%7Ehmeyer/+archive/pythoncad/+build/2653352> >> > > Is it an issue with building pythonocc for python2.7? > > >> >> Anyway - for now I'm willing to try and do my best to get working >> packages for Ubuntu, including updates for python-occ. >> > > Definitely the most important. Please don't feel kept under pressure by > Jelle: he's so enthusiastic. > > >> >> Henning >> > > Thomas > > >> >> 2011/7/28 jelle feringa <jelleferi...@gmail.com>: >> >> Thank you for this important contribution >> > >> > +1 >> > Henning, can we make you the official ubuntu maintainer of pythonocc? >> > Solid distribution is what this project needs, and it seems you are more >> > than qualified to provide this. >> > Would you feel for it? >> > Thanks for your contribution, >> > -jelle >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Pythonocc-users mailing list >> > Pythonocc-users@gna.org >> > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pythonocc-users mailing list >> Pythonocc-users@gna.org >> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users >>
_______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
