Istvan,

I'm a bit confused with your example. It appears that the MMGT_OPT env var
has an impact on the crash produced by your program. If I set MMGT_OPT to 1,
I don't have any crash, crashes with MMGT_OPT=0 and MMGT_OPT=2 (Intel TBB).
Really difficult to say whether it comes from occ or pythonocc.

If you achieve a C++ version of your program (the random part is not
necessary), I will add it to the OCE test suite.

Thomas

2011/9/29 Thomas Paviot <tpav...@gmail.com>

> It will.
>
>
> 2011/9/29 István Csanády <istvancsan...@gmail.com>
>
>> OK, I going to port it today, and check the memory consumption. (I am
>> using opencascade 6.5, but it will work with OCE, won't it?)
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Thomas Paviot <tpav...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> There are two different issues IMO:
>>> - the segfault. I think I have identified the origin of the problem, it
>>> comes from the GarbageCollector implementation
>>> - the leak. I also noticed this increase in memory consumption, however
>>> it's no more the case if the size of the vert list is constant. If you
>>> replace, for instance, the random loop with:
>>> for x in range(50):
>>>     for y in range(50):
>>>         [...]
>>> Then memory consumption does not increase anymore (can you check that
>>> point?). That means that the pythonocc garbage collector does the job as
>>> expected and I suspect rather OCC memory manager to be the cause of this
>>> behavior. To be sure about that, this example should first be ported to C++
>>> and included into the OCE testing suite.
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> 2011/9/29 István Csanády <istvancsan...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> The program you sent is still leaking even if I comment out
>>>> gcurve.GetObject() but it seems to be better then it was. If I leave the
>>>> gcurve.GetObject() line it also crashes.
>>>> Here is a memory consumption log:
>>>>
>>>> 76.015625, 76.015625, 76.19921875, 76.19921875, 76.19921875,
>>>> 83.55859375, 82.9140625, 82.9140625, 82.9140625, 84.13671875,
>>>> 85.296875, 84.99609375, 84.99609375, 84.99609375, 83.24609375,
>>>> 84.234375, 83.24609375, 84.140625, 89.64453125, 89.4140625, 87.4140625,
>>>> 87.4140625, 87.1640625, 87.1640625, 88.3125, 88.1640625, 88.1640625,
>>>> 88.73046875, 88.1640625, 88.1640625, 87.21484375, 86.1640625, 86.1640625,
>>>> 86.1640625, 89.1328125, 89.10546875, 88.16796875, 92.15234375, 91.16796875,
>>>> 90.16796875, 90.16796875, 90.16796875, 95.42578125, 95.07421875,
>>>> 94.71875, 93.76953125, 93.32421875, 92.07421875, 92.921875,
>>>> 92.10546875, 91.49609375, 91.07421875, 91.07421875, 91.07421875,
>>>> 91.07421875, 94.8515625, 94.07421875, 94.07421875, 93.82421875,
>>>> 93.82421875, 93.82421875, 93.82421875, 92.82421875, 92.82421875,
>>>> 93.38671875, 93.1328125, 93.1328125, 93.1328125, 93.1328125, 94.26171875,
>>>> 92.625, 92.625, 93.69921875, 94.5078125, 93.578125, 92.578125,
>>>> 92.578125, 92.078125, 91.078125, 91.078125, 93.2109375, 93.078125,
>>>> 92.078125, 92.078125, 94.12109375, 93.4921875, 93.078125, 95.7890625,
>>>> 93.078125, 93.45703125, 93.078125, 93.078125, 94.41796875, 93.578125,
>>>> 94.27734375, 93.578125, 93.578125, 93.578125, 93.59375, 93.66796875,
>>>> 93.328125, 93.41796875, 93.98828125, 96.0625, 95.5703125, 95.328125,
>>>> 95.44140625, 95.328125, 95.328125, 95.078125, 95.078125, 93.92578125,
>>>> 93.078125, 93.1796875, 93.078125, 92.078125, 92.078125, 93.4921875,
>>>> 93.4921875, 93.078125, 93.078125, 93.078125, 93.4296875, 93.078125,
>>>> 94.2109375, 93.48828125, 94.1640625, 93.578125, 93.26953125, 92.578125,
>>>> 91.578125, 90.828125, 90.828125, 90.828125, 90.828125, 97.32421875,
>>>> 96.7421875, 97.63671875, 96.7421875, 96.7421875, 96.7421875, 96.7421875,
>>>> 96.7421875, 96.7421875, 96.7421875, 96.7421875, 95.7421875, 95.7421875,
>>>> 95.7421875, 95.7421875, 98.7890625, 97.33203125, 97.59375, 97.33203125,
>>>> 97.08203125, 99.3828125, 97.33203125, 96.4453125, 96.08203125,
>>>> 95.08203125, 95.08203125, 95.08203125, 95.08203125, 96.890625, 96.08203125,
>>>> 96.08203125, 97.80078125, 97.08203125, 98.56640625, 97.46875, 97.46875,
>>>> 97.46875, 96.46875, 96.08203125, 100.66015625, 100.33203125
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Thomas Paviot <tpav...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The issue comes from the line curve_object = gcurve.GetObject().
>>>>> Comment out this line to check that memory consumption is constant over
>>>>> time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Attached another implementation of your program, can you please test it
>>>>> and report.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/9/28 István Csanády <istvancsan...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The corrected code does not crash, but it leaks like sieve (0-3MB/s
>>>>>> for me)... And if you try to call smart_purge() after pop_context() it
>>>>>> segfaults.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Thomas Paviot <tpav...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2011/9/28 István Csanády <istvancsan...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Thomas Paviot 
>>>>>>>> <tpav...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Istvan,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not yet. Trying to run your example actually helped me to figure
>>>>>>>>> out/fix a serious regression in the current pythonocc master branch. 
>>>>>>>>> There
>>>>>>>>> is still another bug to fix. I'm currently running pythonocc master (
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/tpaviot/pythonocc)/OCE-0.6.0-rc3.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you run pythonocc-0.5/OCC630?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So you say that my code does not crash for you? If I remember
>>>>>>>> correctly you are a Mac user to, aren't you? Are you using 10.6.7 too 
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> Python 2.6.1 ? May I try to recompile pythonocc with OCE? Can it fix 
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> error? This bug is incredibly hard to track down since the python 
>>>>>>>> debugger
>>>>>>>> does not stop when the C++ code crashes... Do you use any special 
>>>>>>>> tools to
>>>>>>>> debug such errors when developing pythonocc?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I didn't say it crashes, I was running the test.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's done now, I can reproduce the crash, the program segfaults after
>>>>>>> a few loops are performed (I run OSX 10.6.8). I can't explain so far 
>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>> happens, I need to dive into the example (make it even simpler) and 
>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>> what's going on.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I also suggest you use garbage.push_context() and pop_context(): only
>>>>>>> objects created between push/pop will be killed by the smart_purge 
>>>>>>> method.
>>>>>>> The corrected program attached works properly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> István
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> All the best,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2011/9/28 István Csanády <istvancsan...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Have you managed to reproduce the error? I've been trying to track
>>>>>>>>>> down the bug with valgrind - without any success... Probably I should
>>>>>>>>>> recompile python with the debug and --without-pymalloc flags to make
>>>>>>>>>> valgrind work with it. I am using Mac OS X 10.6.7.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> István
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Thomas Paviot <
>>>>>>>>>> tpav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2011/9/27 István Csanády <istvancsan...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Istvan,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Last time when I wrote about this bug I thought it was caused by
>>>>>>>>>>>> some numpy buffer overflow. Unfortunately it was not. Finally I 
>>>>>>>>>>>> managed to
>>>>>>>>>>>> create some code that can reproduce this bug. I have attached the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> code and
>>>>>>>>>>>> some crash logs.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I've been trying to reproduce the issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the problem is probably with OCC's Standard_MMgrOpt
>>>>>>>>>>>> class memory recycling for small blocks (Is it possible that 
>>>>>>>>>>>> smart_purge
>>>>>>>>>>>> frees memory that Standard_MMgrOpt want to reuse?).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Note that sometimes it takes a long time until the error occurs,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but usually after the 50th-100th iteration the code crashes for 
>>>>>>>>>>>> me. (The
>>>>>>>>>>>> code is totally pointless, I have removed every unneccessary parts)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> István
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Pythonocc-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> Pythonocc-users@gna.org
>>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Pythonocc-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Pythonocc-users@gna.org
>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Pythonocc-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Pythonocc-users@gna.org
>>>>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Pythonocc-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> Pythonocc-users@gna.org
>>>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Pythonocc-users mailing list
>>>>>>> Pythonocc-users@gna.org
>>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pythonocc-users mailing list
>>>>>> Pythonocc-users@gna.org
>>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pythonocc-users mailing list
>>>>> Pythonocc-users@gna.org
>>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pythonocc-users mailing list
>>>> Pythonocc-users@gna.org
>>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pythonocc-users mailing list
>>> Pythonocc-users@gna.org
>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pythonocc-users mailing list
>> Pythonocc-users@gna.org
>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Pythonocc-users mailing list
Pythonocc-users@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users

Reply via email to