2011/12/15 MilošKomarčević <kmi...@gmail.com> > Thomas Paviot <tpaviot@...> writes: > > > > > > Hi Henning,From the current pythonocc master branch on github, you can > select, > from the cmake installer, the wrapper you want to compile. It's then > actually > possible to cutomize your own pythonocc according to your needs.I'm not in > favor > of creating a pythonocc light, because it will be impossible to determine > the > "100 or so most used classes and methods" (by who? in which > context?).Thomas > > > > Just thinking out loud here: > > Instead of having to decide what "light" means, would it be possible to > break up > into multiple binary subpackages, following e.g. the Debian packaging > split for > OCE: foundation, modeling, OCAF, visualization, etc. > > Regards, > M > > You're right, that's a clever suggestion.
Thomas
_______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
