2014/1/9, Charles Sharman <charles.shar...@skybeam.com>:
> Hi Marko,
>
> Thanks for all your work on Kubos, the scripting, and the viewer.  I
> couldn't
> view the youtube viewer video, and I haven't spent the time to try it.
> However, I could view the Kubos video, and it's a good start.  Thanks for
> your work.
>
> I too have created a better viewer and a better level 2 scripting interface
>
> to pythonocc.  I designed a building toy and U.S. patent drawings with it
> and
> planned to release my pythonocc enhancements when the toy releases in a
> couple months.  It seems like many would like a more pythonic interface for
>
> modelling and a more capable viewer.  Consider the work of Rudeger, Jayesh,
>
> Dave, you, and me.  Perhaps it's time to review the options, settle on one,
>
> and pool our efforts together.
>
> I'm happy to send my current stuff by email in a pre-release format to any
> who might be interested.  Like you, I'm happy to make it an enhancement to
> pythonocc.
>
> - Charles

Thanks for sharing this. Indeed I'd be very interested in your
project. If you can send it to me I'll definitely have a look at it!

If I interpreted your message correctly, we have actually made
enhancements for pythonOCC in quite different areas - Which I think is
great because those could probably be combined.

I've mainly worked on simplifying the programming interface of the UI
part - I haven't really done any additions to the viewer or created a
different interface for modelling. But I'd be interested in these
things, so I'm curious about your project. In fact I've been thinking
about creating a simplified modelling interface for a long time.

- Marko

_______________________________________________
Pythonocc-users mailing list
Pythonocc-users@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users

Reply via email to