On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Xiaofan Chen <xiaof...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ah, this may be the case. I need to ask again in the libusb mailing > list. The MSVC solution generates stdcall. And I believe if they > are different, then Pete will need to change the MinGW/Cygwin > build to use stdcall. >
Indeed this is a problem. http://old.nabble.com/Calling-convention-of-the-libusb-1.0-Windows-snapshots-td28179386.html In my opinion, both should match and it seems to me using stdcall is the way to go. Wander: what is your opinion as the pyusb developer? -- Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ pyusb-users mailing list pyusb-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyusb-users
