Lokal_Profil added a comment.

I'd suggest using the version number instead of timestamp.

The problem with that is that versioning is today done separately from doing a deprecating commit and to the one doing the commit the current version isn't necessarily clear.

The current versioning system (3.0.20171212) does not look like either of them. I don't know why we have that 0 between the major version and patch version. For example in 3.0.20170713 We have added thanks log support (new functionality) which normally should bump the minor version, but we have not done so.

I believe the current scheme is date versioning only but with a 3.0 prefix to distinguish it from the 2.0 efforts. We could possibly change to 3.DATE to clarify that but I'm not sure this it's needed.

This reminds me off

And as a one off we should define when/why/how we release somewhere on mediawiki.org so that new people (and us) can find it in a year.

@valhallasw Did you get an opportunity to do that?


TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T106121

EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Xqt, Lokal_Profil
Cc: gerritbot, zhuyifei1999, JeanFred, MZMcBride, Ladsgroup, Magul, TerraCodes, Legoktm, Luke081515, hashar, Jay8g, Dalba, Lokal_Profil, StudiesWorld, Multichill, valhallasw, jayvdb, XZise, Ricordisamoa, Aklapper, Xqt, pywikibot-bugs-list, Cpaulf30, Baloch007, Darkminds3113, Lordiis, Adik2382, Th3d3v1ls, Ramalepe, Liugev6, Tbscho, MayS, Lewizho99, Mdupont, JJMC89, Maathavan, TomT0m, Avicennasis, fbstj, Masti, Alchimista, Rxy
_______________________________________________
pywikibot-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikibot-bugs

Reply via email to