| Tacsipacsi added a comment. |
In T199042#4918899, @Dvorapa wrote:In T199042#4490983, @Tacsipacsi wrote:There are several cases where touch.py actually edits the page, which sounds like it’s way easier to fix it on Pywikibot side. For example, I have encountered such when editing outdated translated pages (#mediawiki-extensions-translate), apart from the above cases. I don’t understand what downsides it has. Too much work for developers to put the translation in the code? Doesn’t look so, but I can claim it. Too much complexity? The interwiki bot already has i18n, and it can still be used widely. Too much work for the translators? Nothing must be translated, it can be left out if the translators don’t want to do it.
Please file a new bug about Translate behavior if you feel so
No, I don’t feel so. I feel that Pywikibot should finally accept that this behavior exists. Who knows how many other extensions work like these? Should really all of them be fixed one by one, even if it takes weeks to create the patch? Isn’t it way easier to just allow i18n of this message?
Cc: JAnD, Mpaa, Tacsipacsi, Framawiki, Bodhisattwa, Ankry, Dvorapa, Aklapper, pywikibot-bugs-list, Billinghurst, Wenyi, Mahveotm, Tbscho, MayS, Mdupont, JJMC89, Tshrinivasan, Avicennasis, Info-farmer, mys_721tx, Candalua, jayvdb, Dalba, Masti, Tpt, Alchimista, Rxy
_______________________________________________ pywikibot-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikibot-bugs
