Billinghurst added a comment. This is more than enWS, and more than a policy at one site.
I believe that there is still a place for the script. 1. The script should be considered more versatile than English Wikisource. If the other WSes (or indeed other external sites) wish to utilise the tool, then go for it 2. If enWS received a perfect djvu book that hadn't relied on OCR then why wouldn't we want to have a bot do all the work. I cannot speak for the internals of the Proofread application, or pywiki, so you will need to determine that level of complexity TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T66853 REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>. EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Billinghurst Cc: Nemo_bis, jayvdb, valhallasw, Ricordisamoa, Ladsgroup, Billinghurst, Mpaa, droid, pywikipedia-bugs _______________________________________________ Pywikipedia-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-bugs
