is pywikibot.script.foo.Particularclass always useful, stable and robust enough for other scripts to use? if it is, i think we can split it out and move it to somewhere like pywikibot.utils.foo.Particularclass
On 4/19/09, Nicolas Dumazet <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/4/14 Russell Blau <[email protected]> >> >> Why not put suggested categories on the botwiki page? > > > Will do, when I'll find time for that. > > >> BTW, I'd really like >> to move scripts/ back under the pywikibot/ package; do you object? > > > No strong objections. I'm just wondering why would you want to do that... :) > > I personally liked the idea of clearly separating the core module used for > mediawiki editing, and the "user" scripts we wrote from this core module. > * The former is a set of primitives that any users are likely to need, the > latter contains a lot of different scripts that are not necessary for > creating a new mediawiki bot > * From a developer perspective, it's very different to maintain core scripts > or to modify user scripts. Someone with very little knowledge of the > implementation of the core module can work to improve user scripts. A broken > user script only stops this particular script from working; a broken core > feature is likely to cause much more damage, etc... > > But maybe that distinction is not important enough to get the user scripts > out of the pywikibot bot module. As Merlijn (valhallasw) said, it might also > be useful to be able to import pywikibot.script.foo.Particularclass from > time to time. > > Can we get your input Russell? =) > > -- > Nicolas Dumazet — NicDumZ [ nɪk.d̪ymz ] > _______________________________________________ Pywikipedia-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
