On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Merlijn van Deen <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Sun, August 2, 2009 11:57 am, Stig Meireles Johansen wrote:
> >> is about 10 times slower than just using four (much more readable)
> >> lines of code:
>
<snip />

>
> Additionally, xmlreader actually supports reading bzip2-ed xml (which is
> probably faster than unzipping and running, and possibly even faster than
> running it on the plain xml, depending on processor speed and disk speed):


Just for the fun of it, here are some "benchmarks" running on the XML-file:

sti...@brage:~/t$ time python ../pywikipedia/search.py > t.2

real    1m40.745s
user    1m36.138s
sys     0m1.472s
sti...@brage:~/t$ time ../bin/xml-search.pl
nowiki-20090729-pages-articles.xml "\{\|" 0 > t.t

real    1m22.145s
user    1m20.453s
sys     0m1.204s
sti...@brage:~/t$ time python ../pywikipedia/search.py > t.2

real    1m38.219s
user    1m35.490s
sys     0m1.800s
sti...@brage:~/t$ time ../bin/xml-search.pl
nowiki-20090729-pages-articles.xml "\{\|" 0 > t.t

real    1m24.474s
user    1m22.897s
sys     0m1.236s

*Running with Bzip2'ed xml-file.*

sti...@brage:~/t$ time python ../pywikipedia/search.py > t.2

real    3m59.687s
user    3m53.591s
sys     0m0.640s
sti...@brage:~/t$ time bunzip2 -c nowiki-20090729-pages-articles.xml.bz2 |
../bin/xml-search.pl - "\{\|" 0 > t.t

real    2m42.841s
user    4m8.804s
sys     0m2.388s
sti...@brage:~/t$ time python ../pywikipedia/search.py > t.2

real    3m53.044s
user    3m48.510s
sys     0m0.620s
sti...@brage:~/t$ time bunzip2 -c nowiki-20090729-pages-articles.xml.bz2 |
../bin/xml-search.pl - "\{\|" 0 > t.t

real    2m49.320s
user    4m10.772s
sys     0m2.448s
sti...@brage:~/t$ time python ../pywikipedia/search.py > t.2

real    3m46.337s
user    3m44.318s
sys     0m0.644s
sti...@brage:~/t$ time bunzip2 -c nowiki-20090729-pages-articles.xml.bz2 |
../bin/xml-search.pl - "\{\|" 0 > t.t

real    2m54.216s
user    4m11.724s
sys     0m2.568s

When piping from bunzip2 I get to use both processors (Dual Xeon 3Ghz)... so
it goes a little bit faster... :)

Well, this was a fun waste of time.. I believe the OP now has a solution
either way.... ;)

/Stigmj
_______________________________________________
Pywikipedia-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l

Reply via email to