The last reported bug has been fixed and all works fine. There is the point svn should lead to the right code review for pwb instead to MediaWiki. See https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23177
xqt ----- Original Nachricht ---- Von: Siebrand Mazeland <[email protected]> An: 'Pywikipedia discussion list' <[email protected]> Datum: 02.06.2010 09:22 Betreff: [Pywikipedia-l] Can has pywikipediabot code review? Yes! > Pywikipediabot now has code review in the same way as MediaWiki[1]. Tim has > implemented this a few hours ago. Thanks Tim! > > Below you can find a description of the new functionality. I hope we can > discuss whatever you may see differently or whatever I may have left out. > > Please mind the following if you wish to participate in the code review: > * anyone can use the tool in a read-only mode (right: codereview-use) > * registered users can submit comments on revisions (right: > codereview-post-comment) > * coders can link committers to mediawiki.org user accounts. All committers > should have an account on mediawiki.org with a confirmed e-mail address and > linked their user to their committer identity[2]. This allows you to get > e-mails on your revs and follow-up revs. (right: codereview-link-user, role: > coder) > * coders can add and remove tags for revisions in the review module. For > MediaWiki this feature isn't used that much, but it can be used to group > revisions (rights: codereview-add-tag, codereview-remove-tag, role: coder) > * coders can change the status of revisions (right: codereview-set-status, > role coder). Possible states are: > ** new: default state > ** fixme: something needs to be done for this revision is broken - the > original committer should feel responsible for doing this > ** reverted: this revision has been reverted > ** resolved: this revision was marked fixme, but the issue has been resolved > in a later revision > ** ok: this revision has been reviewed by a coder able to assess the > revision and no issues have been found > ** verified: uncertain, as not used in MediaWiki code review. I propose not > to use this tag until we need it for whatever > * coders can add new coders[3] (role: coder). This is supposed to be a web > of trust. Only change state to ok for revisions that you really understand, > and keep comments to the point. If you have the coder role, you can do code > review also on MediaWiki; please only stick to the project you develop on > with regards to code review functionality. > > If you make follow-up revisions, please mention to which revision (with > r#####) you are following up to in your commit summary. This will > automatically link the new revision in the code review page of the > followed-up revision. > > [1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia > [2] link "(link?)" on > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/author/committername > > [3] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:UserRights/username > [4] list of coders: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:ListUsers/coder > > Cheers! > > Siebrand > > > _______________________________________________ > Pywikipedia-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l > Und was machen Sie heute abend? Alles Events Ihrer Gegend auf einen Blick im Arcor.de-Veranstaltungskalender: http://www.arcor.de/rd/footer.events _______________________________________________ Pywikipedia-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
