Indeed an other problem. I heared from other bot owners they got py2.4 (!) with the server.
----- Original Nachricht ---- Von: "Dr. Trigon" <[email protected]> An: Pywikipedia discussion list <[email protected]> Datum: 10.10.2010 22:20 Betreff: Re: [Pywikipedia-l] Why not Python 3? > Thanks a lot for this link! Interessting document! > > I just decided to let the choice be done form me by my OS developper > (f13 -> redhat) and the toolserver staff... ;)) > > Greetings > > > Am 08.10.2010 08:43, schrieb Jeremy Baron: > > Have you read http://wiki.python.org/moin/Python2orPython3 ? > > > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 02:35, Dr. Trigon<[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think the question here is: > >> * how mature is py3? > >> * how many experiences do we have with it? > >> > >> greetings > >> > >> > >> Am 06.10.2010 17:57, schrieb Bináris: > >>> Hi! > >>> > >>> It is obvious, that we will have to let Python 2.x to go one day. Now > >>> the developers have been working on Pywikipedia 2 for a long time, and > >>> are looking forward to release it. But what then? How long will itt > work? > >>> > >>> In the past weeks I was dealing with Python very much, and I have ideas > >>> on 2 vs. 3. I tried to guess the reason not to use Python 3. As far as I > >>> see, the main problem is with the big quantity of u"..."s. But I they > >>> can probably be converted py the 2to3 module. So what is the main reason > >>> to keep 2.x? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Bináris > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pywikipedia-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Pywikipedia-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l > _______________________________________________ Pywikipedia-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
