On 08/10/11 20:41, Merlijn van Deen wrote:
> On 8 October 2011 20:52,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> It's a mess with the location of pwb documentation. We have several places 
>> but where is the right one?
> I don't think anyone is actively maintaining documentation at the
> moment. I am inclined to state that 'the code' is the only maintained
> documentation.
>
> In addition to the places you mentioned, there is botwiki [1], and
> most wikipedias have some sort if introduction to pywikipedia in their
> own language. Meta also has pages in different languages...
>
> Also problematic: people asking for help on the talk pages, as I don't
> think anyone actually reads them. Meh.
>
> Merlijn
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pywikipedia-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
I think we should setup a new MediaWiki install, (doesn't someone have
pywikipedia.org or something registered?) and use that to maintain
documentation, then we can just get rid of all the ancient unmaintained
stuff, and not have to spend hours picking out the good stuff from that
haystack...

-- Lewis

_______________________________________________
Pywikipedia-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l

Reply via email to