On 15 January 2012 01:16, Merlijn van Deen <[email protected]> wrote:

> In some spare time, I hacked together an automated test runner (...)
>
> The results are available at:
> http://toolserver.org/~pywikipedia/nightly/testing/test_pywikipedia.txt (and
> in xunit format, if anyone prefers that).
>

Anyone who checked the output will have noticed there were a lot of tests
failing. I fixed this today by removing tests (such as the ones that
required user input) or broken code (such as a bit of code from date.py).

In addition, I created a nosetests configuration file, allowing anyone to
quickly run tests by typing 'nosetests' in the pwb root directory (you
might need to pip install nose first).

As a bonus, we now also have coverage reports - and they are not as bad as
I expected! Feel free to browse around
http://toolserver.org/~pywikipedia/nightly/testing/coverage/ .

Best,
Merlijn
_______________________________________________
Pywikipedia-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l

Reply via email to