-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 +1 (also regarding help)
We need also on for trunk, at least for the functions not yet available in rewrite. Doxygen is your friend! I created a config for trunk already and that could be adopted and used for rewrite also. Greetings DrTrigon On 06.07.2013 05:07, Amir Ladsgroup wrote: > I think we need a very detailed documentation for rewrite > > Can you write it, Merlijn? I will help you as much as I can > > Best > > On 7/5/13, Merlijn van Deen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Jan, >> >> If you run pwb.py <scriptname> >> >> instead of cd scripts python <scriptname> >> >> the scripts should work without problems, using a user-config.py >> that is in the same directory. >> >> I'm not sure what you mean with 'the encoding problem'. >> >> Best, Merlijn >> >> >> On 5 July 2013 08:34, Jan Dudík <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> For me ist the biggest problem with rewrite (besides the >>> encoding problem), that scripts are in one subdirectory, but >>> calls libraries from another and this not work. I must copy >>> script to root directory of rewrite and then I can work with >>> tthem, but after update I must copy them again. So I use only >>> calimit and harvest_template, the rest from trunk. >>> >>> Rewrite works in different way - user-config.py is stored >>> somewhere on Document_and:Setings\username\... which is not >>> friendly - but only on win7, on winXP I have this file in root >>> of rewrite :-O >>> >>> JAnD >>> >>> >>> 2013/7/5 Hazard-SJ <[email protected]>: >>>> Even I myself am starting to familiari[sz]e myself with >>>> rewrite (I've >>> been >>>> using trunk all along). >>>> >>>> Hazard-SJ >>>> >>>> ________________________________ From: Dr. Trigon >>>> <[email protected]> To: [email protected] >>>> Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 8:59 AM Subject: Re: >>>> [Pywikipedia-l] Trunk or Rewrite >>>> > +1 > > Since xqt! is putting A LOT OF EFFORT into the project to finally > merge trunk with rewrite (at least the bot scripts), you should > USE REWRITE. > > The only reasons not to do so are: - you started using trunk > already some while ago - you need a function implemented in trunk > already and have no time to port it to rewrite by yourself (and > nobody else is willing to do so) > > Greetings and have fun with rewrite! DrTrigon > > > On 22.06.2013 22:21, Merlijn van Deen wrote: >>>>>> On 21 June 2013 22:43, Chinmay Naik >>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> For our bot, we will be having normal functions like >>>>>> creating/updating items, claims, sources etc.(the Trunk >>>>>> seems sufficient for these functions). I have started >>>>>> coding with the Trunk but now i am a bit concerned about >>>>>> the lifetime about Trunk branch. Any chances it may be >>>>>> get outdated and then i would have to port to Release?? >>>>>> >>>>>> It's mostly the backend code that is much cleaner in >>>>>> rewrite. As such, it is much easier to add/extend >>>>>> functionality, which can be useful with the changes that >>>>>> happen to wikidata - after all, the entire infrastructure >>>>>> is still somewhat under development. >>>>>> >>>>>> Although trunk development will not stop soon, I would >>>>>> suggest to start new wikidata bots using rewrite, for the >>>>>> reasons above. >>>>>> >>>>>> I am also concerned about the pace of development of the >>>>>> Rewrite branch. From another thread, I have noticed about >>>>>> changes to editEntity() to create items etc... >>>>>> >>>>>> This is a change to the *wikidata api*. As an end-user >>>>>> of pywikipedia - trunk or rewrite - you should not notice >>>>>> these changes. As such, I am not sure why you connect >>>>>> this to 'the pace of development of the Rewrite branch'. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 22 June 2013 21:37, Strainu <[email protected] >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/6/22 Bináris <[email protected] >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >>>>>>> We have no statistics on users but I think for some >>>>>>> reason that trunk is more widely used. >>>>>> >>>>>> The reason is python2, at least for me :) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you elaborate on that? Unless you are running an >>>>>> ancient version of python2 (<= 2.5), there should not be >>>>>> any problems running rewrite. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Merlijn >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Pywikipedia-l mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ Pywikipedia-l >>>> mailing list [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ Pywikipedia-l >>>> mailing list [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ Pywikipedia-l >>> mailing list [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l >>> >> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlHa9mgACgkQAXWvBxzBrDDWcACaAyOveLg0wdLJ0U09c+Zpi7Ht u38An3WDHI60VASHN2TMpaqLsSppI2T3 =cfaN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Pywikipedia-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
