-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10.07.2013 22:09, Dr. Trigon wrote: > ... > > The question whether this is the best solution possible should be > discussed. As I see it yes, because we do not need to fork all > those projects and then maintain (update and merge) all the code > all the time. I consider this as sub-optimal because of the > additional workload produced. But if somebody has a good idea or > can explain me how to do this properly, please step forward! I am > NOT an expert, especially in git and there might be better > solutions.
Since I did not get any further feedback, disagreement nor a clear vote/reason against my plans - I would like to do the following step and change the BeautifulSoup.py handling as mentioned below. > At the current stage just downloading of "patch.exe" for win users > is activated. The next step from my side - if everybody agrees - > would be to activate this system for BeautifulSoup.py for further > testing. This would mean that BeautifulSoup.py would be removed > from our repo and in future be automatically downloaded (after a > question to the user) at the first run. Please stay tuned for news. Greetings and Thanks to all! DrTrigon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlHgOPYACgkQAXWvBxzBrDB77gCguUw88YL//JWRvpVLyHYHQbsv +X8AoLTMgOB1KwP6/y10jmmW/eVY3BIh =yCGY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Pywikipedia-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
