-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yes BS is a a very useful tool indeed. It is used in several places,
also some of my scripts - it is often a fast, simple and easy solution.

> We had some discussions in the IRC channel about BS. There are so
> many problems about using BS in different systems. So many people
> don't want to run patch.exe and so many people are using servers
> for running bots and don't have permission to do that.

I understand that we had alread several discussion about it indeed. A
hard thing for me is to help or solve the situation because I never
got any feadback WHY running patch.exe is such a big issue? I just
always heard "I don't like it." - ok, but WHY?
It is not dangerous at all AND it is a standard tool, in fact it is
the base on which git works...

> My suggestion is using the old system (an internal folder as an 
> external like i18n but I don't think we need to make another
> external) but if you think we can do something else I'll be glad to
> discuss

What do you exactly mean with "old system"? Do you want to create a
repo 'externals' and just drop BS there in order to use as submodule?
Or what was the concept?

> Please keep in mind compatibility is one of the most important
> issues of PWB

Indeed! The current solution (using patch) is compatible with
linux/mac (since patch is in the OS distro there) and with win through
patch.exe. In fact win in the main problem here... ;)) Any other
important OS that I missed? (and does not have patch like all/most? unix)

And may be I should also mention that not only BS is an issue in this
context, there are some other modules also - I sent the link with the
list in a previous mail.

I would be VERY happy to finally find a solution here!

Greetings and all the best!
DrTrigon

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlISgUAACgkQAXWvBxzBrDAxXgCdE46gBgRXjNnTeulFCkkw2+D5
bQ8An1aEUXwIrHLl+b3Tvo3NsEPzLebM
=1HKM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Pywikipedia-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l

Reply via email to