On 15 January 2014 13:47, Bináris <[email protected]> wrote: > I am afraid I don't really understand you. > Was there any real problem with SVN version numbers? > What kind of local commit? There was one system with one series of > numbers. Do you mean your own computer by local? That is not interesting > for public. >
Reading a git tutorial (or two) might help to understand the issue. To help understand the differences from SVN, http://hginit.com/00.html is really helpful - it's written for mercurial, but you can just read 'git' everywhere 'hg' or 'mercurial' is used. > The old version number HAD some meaning. It gave a sort order, some help > where to put a script in my mind. This new system is only useful for > computers. Well, we can live together with that, but if there is any chance > to install some human readable version, I would appreciate it. > I have given you the exact command that you can use to get 'a human readable, incrementing version number'. But I've asked this before, and I'll ask it again: why do you need a revision number? What is the use case, and why couldn't that use case also be handled by a revision hash? Merlijn
_______________________________________________ Pywikipedia-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
