Sorry for doing that. I had to do it but I didn't have time to check archivebot.py (which is a huge code) and find best fix for it but builds were failing and we were fixing them one by one.
Anyone interested in fixing archivebot.py bug? Best On 7/27/14, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah, maybe. I just saw your "fixes" at my Talk page(s). > > xqt > > ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----- > Von: Amir Ladsgroup > Gesendet: 26.07.2014 23:22 > An: Pywikibot discussion list > Betreff: Re: [Pywikipedia-l] The build is broken > > it was another bug that John and Ricordisamoa are talking about. > > On 7/27/14, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: >> This is not a bug in testing. The test detects a bug for archivebot.py >> which >> fails for unsigned threads. >> >> xqt >> >> ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----- >> Von: John Mark Vandenberg >> Gesendet: 26.07.2014 18:21 >> An: Pywikibot discussion list >> Betreff: Re: [Pywikipedia-l] The build is broken >> >> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Ricordisamoa >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> The build is still broken, but because of this edit, that breaks the >>> timestamp detection of the ArchiveBot. >>> Maybe a fictitious, write-protected talk page should be used? >> >> That is being tracked on >> >> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67663 >> >> An alternative test page would be a good solution. >> >> Or maybe the unit test could allow unsigned sections to be added to >> the talk page. >> >> -- >> John Vandenberg >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pywikipedia-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l >> > > > -- > Amir > > _______________________________________________ > Pywikipedia-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l > -- Amir _______________________________________________ Pywikipedia-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l
