On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:35:04 +0100 Andre Wobst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have to think about this a bit. Its a very interesting > idea (and that obvious, that it's really strange, that we didn't > discussed that already). Thanks for your help. I just found it now it the FAQ. Can I suggest a couple of things: A) yes, it looks like PyX is great, powerful, etc. The examples show this off, but they are 90% useless (who needs curvey axes ???). They should be renamed "screenshots". B) how to plot diamonds should not be in the FAQ, it's either in the examples or in a cookbook. The FAQ (or at least the graph section) is not an FAQ at all, it's a cookbook. C) examples should actually cover 90% of what people want to do. Not gee-whiz demos that nobody can understand anyway. I don't mean to sound harsh here, but it's been 12months since i last used PyX and I am hit again with exactly the same impression as I was last time. I can't make any sense of the architecture of PyX. If that's the way it's going to be (powerful but difficult to use) then you need a _lot_ of basic cookbook/example's that people can take and modify to suite. Thanks anyway, I hope I can promote PyX more in the future !! Simon. -- Simon Burton, B.Sc. Licensed PO Box 8066 ANU Canberra 2601 Australia Ph. 61 02 6249 6940 http://arrowtheory.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ PyX-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyx-user
