On 7/31/07, Tal Einat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/6/07, Tal Einat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all, (just joined the group)
> >
> > I've been developing IDLE over the past 2 years or so. Even before
> > that, I helped a friend of mine, Noam Raphael, write IDLE's
> > auto-completion, which is included in recent versions of IDLE.
> >
> > Noam wrote the original completion code from scratch, and AFAIK every
> > Python IDE which features code completion has done the same. Surely
> > there is -some- functionality which could be useful cross-IDE?
> > Retrieving possible completions from the namespace, for example. And
> > we should be learning from each-others' ideas and experiences.
> >
> > So how about we design a generic Python completion module, that
> > each IDE could extend, and use for the completion logic?
> >
> > - Tal
> >
>
> Hi again everyone,
>
> I'll try to sum up what has been said so far, and how I see things.
>
> [snip]

One more note: We should distinguish between completion in an editor
and completion in a shell. The conversation up until now has focused
on editors, which is reasonable since that is the problematic scene. I
think a generic Python completion library should support completion in
both contexts, especially if it uses can use a shell's namespace for
completion in the editor.

- Tal

Reply via email to