I'm just going to reply to the bit that I want to ;)

[snip]
> I'm glad you said this, because it gives me a chance to repeat the
> essential statement of my first post:
>
>   To displace Emacs, an editor must offer much *more* than Emacs.
>
> To say this another way, Robin's post makes no sense if all we want
> is:
>
> a) an Editor and
> b) an Editor with all and only Emacs's features!
>
> Do you see?  Nobody in their right mind is going to spend years *just*
> duplicating Emacs.  Emacs is *already* an open source project.

Over the years (and in particular since Scintilla was made available
in various programming languages via wrappers), I've seen a lot of
editors spring up with different features, designs, goals, etc.  More
than a few of them state that one of their goals is to "replace X",
where X = Emacs, Vim, Eclipse, and any one of a number of other
editors, tools, etc.

Every editor has their unique features and designs that gives each one
of them an edge in one way or another.  But not all of them can
replace Emacs ;) .  Then again...I'm not sure that it really makes
sense to replace Emacs or Vim (WRT major functionalities); the
console-centric nature of both of them has invaded even their "GUI"
variants, and the various clones suffer (IMO) from the same
limitations that the original Emacs and Vim.

To really change programming, and really start replacing the "old
standards" without cloning them, I think, requires thinking
substantially different from what the mainstream has thought "right"
before.  The browser in "Code Browser"
(http://code-browser.sourceforge.net/images/code-browser-pane.png) is
awesome, as is the general source navigation demo
(http://code-browser.sourceforge.net/demo.html).  The multi-editing
capabilities of SubEthaEdit
(http://www.codingmonkeys.de/subethaedit/collaborate.html) blow me
away every time (I've been waiting for wxPython to wrap the
multi-indicator build of Scintilla for over a year so that I can
implement it myself :P ).

I do think that Leo does things differently from other editors that
came before and exist currently, so in that sense, *I* think that
Edward's doing a great job.  The real question is whether Edward can
get people who write and love their own editors to drop them in favor
of Leo ;) .

Just my 2 cents.
 - Josiah

Reply via email to