> I think most of this came up in an earlier thread but I'm not finding it > right now, so I'm starting a new one. > > I'm proposing that we make all the taskotron-related projects as > similar as we can with regard to git repo setup, location and how we do > reviews. If we keep them all slightly different, it makes asking for > contributions more difficult and the contributions guide (which still > needs to be written :-/) more complicated. > > To be specific, the repos that I'm including in this are: > - libtaskotron > - taskotron-trigger > - resultsdb > - resultsdb_frontend > - resultsdb_api > - pytap13 > - fake_fedorainfra > > The settings that I'm proposing for all those repos are: > > - use gitflow and set 'develop' as the default branch > - host projects under bitbucket/fedoraqa > * makes it easier to say "find our projects at this url" instead of > "find projects X,Y and Z here. find A and B here" > - code submissions and issues/tasks are tracked through phabricator > > Any objections to doing this to all the repos I mentioned?
Almost no objections :-) For pytap13, I think it would make sense to keep the issues in Bitbucket. Once the library is complete, we won't touch it too much, it's just a utility library with a very narrow scope. In this case, I think it would be better to keep the issue tracker more accessible (people are much more likely to create a Bitbucket account than our Phab account). _______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
