On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 20:27:34 -0400 (EDT) Scott Talbert <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Can someone please help me with a depcheck question? See this log > file for the package 'miniz': > > https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/taskmaster//builders/x86_64/builds/6954/steps/runtask/logs/stdio > > As best I as I can tell, the depcheck is failing because there is no > 32-bit glibc-headers package in the x86_64 repository. But do we > care because miniz 32-bit package won't be in the x86_64 repository > either? True, it's not in the x86_64 repository but x86_64 systems are multilib which means that you can install i686 packages on them. I don't see many other packages which have a requires on glibc-headers, so I wonder if there is a different way to represent that which doesn't cause problems for multilib systems. # repoquery --whatrequires glibc-headers cfitsio-devel-0:3.350-2.fc20.i686 cfitsio-devel-0:3.350-2.fc20.x86_64 glibc-devel-0:2.18-11.fc20.i686 glibc-devel-0:2.18-11.fc20.x86_64 glibc-devel-0:2.18-16.fc20.i686 glibc-devel-0:2.18-16.fc20.x86_64 libecb-0:0.20130509-2.fc20.noarch loki-lib-devel-0:0.1.7-8.fc20.i686 loki-lib-devel-0:0.1.7-8.fc20.x86_64 sg3_utils-devel-0:1.37-2.fc20.i686 sg3_utils-devel-0:1.37-2.fc20.x86_64 shedskin-0:0.9-5.fc20.noarch smp_utils-devel-0:0.97-5.fc20.i686 smp_utils-devel-0:0.97-5.fc20.x86_64 Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
