> On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 14:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I'm back working on moving fedora-qa to Pagure. I'm now dealing with > > the 'stats' scripts, and there's a problem: it appears that stats-bodhi > > has never actually been properly licensed. It has no license header or > > license text, and AFAICS, never has. I can't simply declare it to be > > F/OSS licensed, as I didn't write it. > > > > Can Lukas or Kamil give us a license declaration for this code? Thanks! > > There's one other thing without an explicit license, leftover-tagged- > builds.sh , which was written by Kamil. It's pretty trivial (and maybe > no longer needed), but if you could declare a license that'd be good.
I think putting GPL2+ on them is a reasonable choice. The leftover-tagged-builds.sh was I think written during some time that we had a lot of issues with Bodhi. I'd probably still keep it there, but yes, we haven't needed it lately. _______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
