On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Chris Steipp <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Chris McMahon <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> Development environments: >> * What may be more valuable would be bare-wiki tests for particular >> development environment, for example a bare wiki with MobileFrontend >> installed. Of course, the regression tests for an Extension on a clean >> Mediawiki install would have to be managed from within that repo. >> > > I'd vote for having a set of tests that should pretty much pass against a > vagrant environment with just the mediawiki role enabled (basically core > with no extensions). When we do MediaWiki major releases, we can take that > and move it to whatever repo(s) get greated for the regression tests > against the public releases. > I created an "enhancement" Bugzilla ticket for this under Quality Assurance, and marked it "easy". https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60347 . I don't see it as being a high priority right now, but I don't want to lose sight of it altogether either. -Chris
_______________________________________________ QA mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
