On Jan 31, 2014, at 2:12, Željko Filipin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected]> wrote: > I though this was one of the most interesting talks given at dotJs last > December. Web integration testing with a unique point of view. > > Thanks for the link. I did not have the time to check out his project (yet) > and from the talk I could not figure out how it is different. :) I just watched the video & skimmed the readme / tutorial on github — it sounds pretty similar to FiveUI [1], but with more of a focus on site-specific tests than general guidelines. (disclaimer: I’m the project lead / maintainer for FiveUI) There seems to be a notion of needing more semantic definitions associated with the DOM in both projects, I’d like to see a community-accepted set of semantic annotations (similar to the WAI ARIA roles, but at a finer granularity), but the concept of ‘widgets’ in Watai seems like it could fill that gap. —Rogan [1] There’s a description of FiveUI, with links in an email I sent out from last week, and it’s available on github as well: https://github.com/GaloisInc/FiveUI > > Željko > _______________________________________________ > QA mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ QA mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
