Chris (or someone else from QA), it appears that you removed mobile-tech from the failure emails as well as mobile-l. Can you please resubscribe mobile-tech? Otherwise, we have no idea when tests are failing. Thanks to Jon for pointing out the eerie silence we've had over the last couple of weeks :)
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Chris McMahon <[email protected]>wrote: > > Done. > > BTW, failures in Chrome since yesterday seem to be because of > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/113997/ , if you'd like to merge that. > It's an interesting race condition, see > https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61504 > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Juliusz Gonera <[email protected]>wrote: > >> She probably wouldn't, but that's a separate issue ;) >> >> Chris, can we disable the e-mails to [email protected] for >> now? >> >> >> >> On 02/14/2014 06:05 PM, Jon Robson wrote: >> >> Agreed. >> In terms of mobile-l would you mother understand how to sign up it in the >> first place...? >> Anyway I should get back to vacation. ;) >> On 14 Feb 2014 21:52, "Juliusz Gonera" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Also, I think there are better ways of showing something's failing... >>> Many open source projects on GitHub use a small Travis badge. Maybe we >>> could have something similar? >>> >>> >>> On 02/14/2014 05:43 PM, Jon Robson wrote: >>> >>> I worry about us making anything private. I'd rather we fixed the root >>> problem. I think we already have an unhealthy obsession with using >>> mobile-tech that Yuvi has brought up numerous times and I'd love us to use >>> mobile-l more as we are alienating a large audience of potential >>> contributors. >>> >>> The majority of false positives seem to be related to timeouts. Can we >>> not simply increase the default timeout from 5s to 10s to improve things >>> since beta labs is unstable and slow and this seems to be the main cause? >>> >>> Ideally we should be aiming to get these emails as accurate as possible >>> and think about adding a call to action on them "help us fix this issue - >>> submit a patch now!" >>> On 13 Feb 2014 18:37, "Arthur Richards" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I agree with this - at least until we drastically reduce the number of >>>> false positive failures. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Juliusz Gonera >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think we should send them only to mobile-tech, at least for now, >>>>> until we figure out some remaining issues. Right now our public mobile-l >>>>> list is getting spammed with them quite a lot. Opinions? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Juliusz >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Arthur Richards >>>> Software Engineer, Mobile >>>> [[User:Awjrichards]] >>>> IRC: awjr >>>> +1-415-839-6885 x6687 <%2B1-415-839-6885%20x6687> >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- Arthur Richards Software Engineer, Mobile [[User:Awjrichards]] IRC: awjr +1-415-839-6885 x6687
_______________________________________________ QA mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
