On 6 June 2014 16:21, Chris McMahon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Matthew Flaschen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Are they voting or non-voting? >> > > I think browser tests should always be non-voting. Therein lies a > day-long training session... >
And FWIW I fundamentally disagree. :-) Non-voting tests are routinely ignored. If your change breaks a test, you should either fix your code or update the test; both of these actions are conscious responses to the outcome of the test, and if they're not part of the pre-merge workflow they too rarely don't happen. J. -- James D. Forrester Product Manager, VisualEditor Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. [email protected] | @jdforrester
_______________________________________________ QA mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
