On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Chris McMahon < [email protected]> wrote:
> As I recall, it was also because I had recommendations from Ruby experts > at places like Groupon and Leandog who recommended RVM at the time. It was a while ago, I have probably forgotten the entire story. I thought I was pushing for it, but it is likely that it was already in place when I joined. Anyway, at the time (a year or two ago) it was probably the way to go. We might want to revisit that decision now. The Ruby Toolbox says rbenv is slightly more popular than rvm[1]. Željko -- 1: https://www.ruby-toolbox.com/categories/ruby_version_management
_______________________________________________ QA mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
